Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 120441
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120441
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120441
Table 1 Model effectiveness evaluation
| Domain | Observed average |
| Physical attributes | |
| Anatomical landmark visibility | 4.25 |
| Model organ size accuracy | 4.3 |
| Authenticity of materials | 4.4 |
| Overall impression of the model | 4.35 |
| Realism of experience | |
| The force required to move the duodenoscope within the model | 4.6 |
| The force required to insert the guidewire | 4.35 |
| Authenticity of the duodenal papilla | 4.2 |
| Rate your ability to perform the below tasks on the simulator | |
| Using a duodenoscope to locate the papilla | 4.1 |
| Guidewire placement catheter | 4.5 |
| Nipple incision | 4.3 |
| Insertion of stone extraction basket | 4.3 |
| Basket stone extraction | 4.15 |
| Rate the value of the simulator | |
| Evaluating the value of simulators as training tools | 4.4 |
| Evaluating the value of simulators as teaching tools | 4.6 |
| Rate the simulator’s relevance to your real-world operations | 4.45 |
- Citation: Zhou WJ, Qin JW, Li C, Li XF. Application of a three-dimensional-printed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography simulation operation model in surgical training and teaching. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(8): 120441
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i8/120441.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.120441