Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 118525
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.118525
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.118525
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Characteristic | Observation group (n = 52) | Control group (n = 48) |
| Age (years) | 58.3 ± 10.5 | 59.7 ± 11.2 |
| Male sex | 33 (63.5) | 29 (60.4) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 ± 3.2 | 24.1 ± 3.5 |
| Tumor distance from anal verge (cm) | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 3.6 ± 1.3 |
| TNM stage | ||
| I | 12 (23.1) | 10 (20.8) |
| II | 21 (40.4) | 19 (39.6) |
| III | 19 (36.5) | 19 (39.6) |
| Neoadjuvant therapy | 35 (67.3) | 31 (64.6) |
| Time to stoma closure (months) | 4.2 ± 1.1 | 4.5 ± 1.3 |
- Citation: Liu XJ, Wei ML, Liu LL, Qin JJ. Pelvic floor rehabilitation improves anorectal function after sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(8): 118525
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i8/118525.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.118525