Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2026; 18(8): 116300
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.116300
Published online Aug 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.116300
Table 2 Distinguishing true incident nephrolithiasis from unveiled prevalent microlithiasis in acute pancreatitis
| Domain | True incident nephrolithiasis | Unveiled prevalent microlithiasis |
| Biological premise | New crystal nucleation, aggregation, retention, and growth produce a genuinely new stone | Previously silent crystals or microliths become detectable during acute evaluation |
| Expected time course | Usually, weeks to months before a clinically meaningful calculus becomes evident | Detection may shift from hours to days without implying new stone formation |
| Baseline imaging expectation | No renal deposit should be present on high-quality baseline computed tomography | Small pre-existing deposits may be missed on ultrasound, yet still be present at baseline |
| Urinary evidence needed | Persistent lithogenic profile on 24-hour urine supports causal inference | Acute metabolic disturbance may transiently increase visibility without proving chronic stone disease |
| Short-term behavior | Lesion persists or enlarges on follow-up imaging | Focus may regress after hydration and recovery from inflammatory-metabolic stress |
| Clinical implication | Long-term stone prevention and metabolic evaluation are usually warranted | Repeat post-recovery assessment is needed before labeling chronic nephrolithiasis |
- Citation: Yuksel S. Acute pancreatitis, hypercalcemia, and kidney stones: True incidence or unveiled prevalence? World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(8): 116300
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i8/116300.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.116300