BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 121387
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.121387
Table 4 Propensity score matching and sensitivity analysis results, mean ± SD/median interquartile range
Comparison
Indicator
Ziwu-Liuzhu time-specific external treatment group
Comparator group
Statistic
P value
Ziwu-Liuzhu time-specific external treatment vs sitz bath (PSM, n = 58 pairs)Healing time (day)19 (16-23)29 (25-34)Z = -5.21< 0.001
CRP after treatment (mg/L)9.1 ± 4.317.8 ± 6.1t = -8.64< 0.001
TNF-α after treatment (pg/mL)17.1 ± 5.427.4 ± 7.6t = -7.93< 0.001
IL-6 after treatment (pg/mL)11.4 ± 4.720.6 ± 6.8t = -8.11< 0.001
Total effective rate (%)53/58 (91.4)37/58 (63.8)χ2 = 12.37< 0.001
Logistic regression OR (95%CI)4.12 (1.89-8.97)Reference< 0.001
Ziwu-Liuzhu time-specific external treatment vs sitz bath plus acupoint application group (PSM, n = 61 pairs)Healing time (day)18 (15-22)24 (20-28)Z = -4.28< 0.001
VAS pain score2.2 ± 0.93.3 ± 1.1t = -5.43< 0.001
CRP after treatment (mg/L)8.7 ± 4.013.4 ± 5.2t = -5.58< 0.001
TNF-α after treatment (pg/mL)16.5 ± 5.322.4 ± 6.4t = -5.01< 0.001
IL-6 after treatment (pg/mL)10.9 ± 4.516.2 ± 5.7t = -5.32< 0.001
Total effective rate (%)57/61 (93.4)49/61 (80.3)χ2 = 5.290.021
Logistic regression OR (95%CI)3.26 (1.28-8.29)Reference0.013


Write to the Help Desk