Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 121291
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.121291
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.121291
Table 3 Comparison of complication rates between the two patient groups, n (%)
| Complication type | Control group (n = 51) | Observation group (n = 53) | χ2 | P value |
| Nausea and vomiting | 32 (62.75) | 20 (37.74) | - | - |
| Sore throat | 24 (47.06) | 6 (11.32) | - | - |
| Abdominal distension | 3 (5.88) | 2 (3.77) | - | - |
| Incision infection | 3 (5.88) | 2 (3.77) | - | - |
| Pulmonary infection | 3 (5.88) | 1 (1.89) | - | - |
| Anastomotic fistula | 2 (3.92) | 1 (1.89) | - | - |
| Total complications | 41 (80.39) | 27 (50.94) | 9.959 | 0.002a |
- Citation: Ge J, Wang ZL. Effect of whole-process management protocol in preventing device-related intraoperative pressure injuries in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(7): 121291
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i7/121291.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.121291