Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 120890
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120890
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120890
Table 6 Comparison of postoperative nausea and vomiting between groups, n (%)
| Variable | ESPB group (n = 91) | TAPB group (n = 92) | Z/χ2 value | P value |
| PONV grade | -0.892 | 0.372 | ||
| Grade 0 | 62 (68.1) | 58 (63.0) | ||
| Grade 1 | 18 (19.8) | 20 (21.7) | ||
| Grade 2 | 8 (8.8) | 10 (10.9) | ||
| Grade 3 | 3 (3.3) | 4 (4.3) | ||
| PONV incidence | 29 (31.9) | 34 (37.0) | 0.516 | 0.473 |
| Antiemetic use | 11 (12.1) | 14 (15.2) | 0.38 | 0.538 |
- Citation: Cheng H, Liu C, Li MY. Erector spinae plane block vs transversus abdominis plane block for visceral and somatic pain after laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(7): 120890
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i7/120890.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.120890