Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 120740
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120740
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120740
Table 5 Comparison of the incidence of procedure-related adverse reactions between two groups, n (%)
| Parameter | ESD group (n = 156) | ESTD group (n = 101) | χ2 | P value |
| Adverse reaction incidence rate | 27 (17.31) | 8 (7.92) | 4.592 | 0.032 |
| Delayed bleeding | 8 (5.13) | 3 (2.97) | ||
| Esophageal stricture | 16 (10.26) | 8 (7.92) | ||
| Infection | 2 (1.28) | 1 (0.99) | ||
| Moderate-to-severe events | 11 (7.05) | 2 (1.98) | 2.312 | 0.128 |
- Citation: Zhang D, Hao XX, Zhang C, Liang Y. Efficacy and adverse reactions of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection in early esophageal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(7): 120740
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i7/120740.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120740