Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 120621
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120621
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120621
Table 3 Comparison of primary endpoints, including postoperative complications and wound healing time, between the anal fistula clip and incision and thread hanging groups, n (%)
| Complications | AFC (n = 35) | ITH (n = 35) | Analysis | P value |
| Total healed | 33 (94.3) | 32 (91.4) | Fisher’s exact test | 0.63 |
| Any complications | 0 (0.0) | 4 (11.4) | Fisher’s exact test | 0.02 |
| Bleeding | 0 | 1 (2.86) | - | - |
| Edema | 0 | 1 (2.86) | - | - |
| Stenosis | 0 | 2 (5.71) | - | - |
| Healing time (days) | 26.0 ± 2.5 | 34.5 ± 3.1 | Welch t-test | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Han Y, Fang XL, Tang K, Tang R, Mei XS, Zhang R, Chen L, Wang JM, Li M. Modified anal fistula clip: A safe and effective alternative to incision and thread hanging for anal fistula. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(7): 120621
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i7/120621.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120621