Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 120222
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120222
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120222
Table 3 Comparison of secondary outcomes in the matched cohort (n = 250), n (%)/mean ± SD
| Outcome dimension | Watson-FTS (n = 125) | Routine care (n = 125) | Unadjusted difference | Adjusted effect (95%CI)1 | P value |
| Physiological and functional | |||||
| First ambulation time (hours) | 26.4 ± 6.2 | 38.9 ± 8.5 | -12.5 | β: -12.1 (-13.8 to -10.4) | < 0.001 |
| Postoperative stay (days)2, median (IQR) | 7.0 (6.0, 8.0) | 9.0 (7.5, 11.0) | -2.0 | β: -1.8 (-2.3 to -1.3) | < 0.001 |
| Discharge KPS score | 84.5 ± 5.2 | 78.2 ± 6.1 | +6.3 | β: +5.9 (4.6-7.2) | < 0.001 |
| Humanistic process quality | |||||
| Teach-back completion | 115 (92.0) | 81 (64.8) | +27.2 | aOR: 5.82 (2.76-12.28) | < 0.001 |
| Individualized plan rate | 111 (88.8) | 65 (52.0) | +36.8 | aOR: 7.14 (3.58-14.24) | < 0.001 |
| Self-efficacy milestone3 | 102 (81.6) | 71 (56.8) | +24.8 | aOR: 3.25 (1.84-5.74) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Jiang D, Shang FJ, Yu W. Association of Watson-based humanistic fast track surgery with stoma colorectal cancer recovery: A propensity matched study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(7): 120222
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i7/120222.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120222