Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2026; 18(6): 118910
Published online Jun 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.118910
Published online Jun 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.118910
Table 7 Comparison of computed tomography quantitative parameters in subgroups by surgical approach, mean ± SD/median (interquartile rage)
| Surgical approach | Stricture group | Non-stricture group | Statistic | P value |
| Total gastrectomy (n = 72) | n = 14 | n = 58 | ||
| nPV-HU (%) | 33.8 (26.4-40.2) | 50.6 (40.2-62.8) | Z = -3.512 | < 0.001 |
| PV-HU/aorta-HU | 1.35 ± 0.17 | 1.54 ± 0.21 | t = -3.124 | 0.002 |
| Distal gastrectomy (n = 127) | n = 9 | n = 118 | ||
| nPV-HU (%) | 38.2 (30.4-46.8) | 53.6 (42.8-65.2) | Z =-2.687 | 0.007 |
| PV-HU/aorta-HU | 1.42 ± 0.19 | 1.57 ± 0.23 | t = -2.012 | 0.046 |
- Citation: Zhang H, Zhu B, Bai GJ. Predictive value of portal venous phase computed tomography parameters for anastomotic stricture after D2 gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(6): 118910
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i6/118910.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.118910