Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2026; 18(6): 117147
Published online Jun 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.117147
Published online Jun 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.117147
Table 2 Comparison of adverse event occurrence rates between the two groups, n (%)
| Item | Assembly error | Part missing | Instrument damage | Packaging not standard | Total occurrence rate |
| Conventional group | 5 (3.6) | 6 (4.3) | 1 (0.7) | 9 (6.5) | 21 (15.2) |
| PDCA group | 1 (0.4) | 2 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (1.3) | 6 (2.7) |
| χ2 | 5.257 | 4.685 | 1.620 | 7.108 | 19.331 |
| P value | 0.022 | 0.030 | 0.203 | 0.008 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Dong LF, Shen FQ, Zhu WL, Qian YY. PDCA cycle-based optimization of laparoscopic instrument management in digestive surgery supply rooms. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(6): 117147
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i6/117147.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.117147