Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 118341
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.118341
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.118341
Table 2 Assessment of the quality and limitations of the research evidence
| Evaluation criteria | Features | Level of evidence |
| Research design | Single-centre retrospective cohort | Below average |
| Sample size | 206 cases of early-stage gastric cancer | Intermediate |
| Follow-up interval | Short-term perioperative period; no long-term survival | The evidence is incomplete |
| Bias risk | Selection bias, baseline imbalance | Limited generalisability |
| Strength of the conclusion | Short-term benefits are certain, but long-term efficacy is uncertain | This requires validation through prospective studies |
- Citation: Zhang YL, Zong L, Hu HB. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A review of comparative perspectives on treatment outcomes vs gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(5): 118341
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i5/118341.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.118341