BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 118341
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.118341
Table 1 Comparison of key perioperative indicators between endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional gastrectomy
Key performance indicators
ESD group
Conventional gastrectomy group
Statistical results
Conclusion
Overall treatment success rate92.86%Slightly lowerχ² = 2.293, P > 0.05There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups
Incidence of complications5.56%13.27%P < 0.05The ESD group offers superior safety
Intraoperative blood lossLessMore-The ESD group is superior
Duration of the operationShorterLonger-The ESD group is superior
Recovery time after oral administration2.43 daysLonger-The ESD group is superior


Write to the Help Desk