Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 118341
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.118341
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.118341
Table 1 Comparison of key perioperative indicators between endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional gastrectomy
| Key performance indicators | ESD group | Conventional gastrectomy group | Statistical results | Conclusion |
| Overall treatment success rate | 92.86% | Slightly lower | χ² = 2.293, P > 0.05 | There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups |
| Incidence of complications | 5.56% | 13.27% | P < 0.05 | The ESD group offers superior safety |
| Intraoperative blood loss | Less | More | - | The ESD group is superior |
| Duration of the operation | Shorter | Longer | - | The ESD group is superior |
| Recovery time after oral administration | 2.43 days | Longer | - | The ESD group is superior |
- Citation: Zhang YL, Zong L, Hu HB. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A review of comparative perspectives on treatment outcomes vs gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(5): 118341
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i5/118341.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.118341