BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 116701
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.116701
Table 4 Univariate analysis of factors influencing 3-year prognosis in gastric cancer patients, n (%)
Indicator
Poor prognosis group (n = 37)
Good prognosis group (n = 70)
χ2 value
P value
Gender0.8880.346
    Male (n = 70)22 (59.46)48 (68.57)
    Female (n = 37)15 (40.54)22 (31.43)
Age (years)1.3240.250
    < 60 (n = 63)19 (51.35)44 (62.86)
    ≥ 60 (n = 44)18 (48.65)26 (37.14)
Maximum tumor diameter (cm)0.4630.497
    < 4 (n = 54)17 (45.95)37 (52.86)
    ≥ 4 (n = 53)20 (54.05)33 (47.14)
Differentiation degree0.1510.698
    Moderate-to-high differentiation (n = 35)13 (35.14)22 (31.43)
    Low differentiation (n = 72)24 (64.86)48 (68.57)
Tumor location0.9650.617
    Cardia and fundic region (n = 19)5 (13.51)14 (20.00)
    Gastric body (n = 22)7 (18.92)15 (21.43)
    Pyloric region (n = 66)25 (67.57)41 (58.57)
Borrmann type0.6760.411
    I-II (n = 35)14 (37.84)21 (30.00)
    III-IV (n = 72)23 (62.16)49 (70.00)
Invasion depth0.6060.436
    T1-T2 (n = 27)11 (29.73)16 (22.86)
    T3-T4 (n = 80)26 (70.27)54 (77.14)
Metastases to lymph nodes5.3190.021
    N0-N1 (n = 54)13 (35.14)41 (58.57)
    N2-N3 (n = 53)24 (64.86)29 (41.43)
Distant metastasis10.0700.002
    M0 (n = 68)16 (43.24)52 (74.29)
    M1 (n = 39)21 (56.76)18 (25.71)
TNM staging5.2600.022
    I-II (n = 51)12 (32.43)39 (55.71)
    III-IV (n = 56)25 (67.57)31 (44.29)
CA199 (U/mL)2.0340.154
    < 35 (n = 81)25 (67.57)56 (80.00)
    ≥ 35 (n = 26)12 (32.43)14 (20.00)
CEA (ng/mL)3.6600.056
    < 5 (n = 86)26 (70.27)60 (85.71)
    ≥ 5 (n = 21)11 (29.73)10 (14.29)


Write to the Help Desk