Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 116490
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.116490
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.116490
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Group | n | Sex | Age (years) | BMI (kg/m2) | cT grade | cN grade | ||||
| Male | Female | T1 | T2 | T3 | N0 | N1 | ||||
| Thoracoscopic group | 58 | 42 (72.4) | 16 (27.6) | 62.5 ± 8.1 | 22.8 ± 2.5 | 10 (17.2) | 25 (43.1) | 23 (39.7) | 35 (60.3) | 23 (39.7) |
| Open surgery group | 40 | 32 (80.0) | 8 (20.0) | 64.2 ± 7.6 | 23.1 ± 2.7 | 8 (20.0) | 16 (40.0) | 16 (40.0) | 22 (55.0) | 18 (45.0) |
| χ2/t | 0.784 | 1.052 | 0.573 | 0.211 | 0.327 | |||||
| P value | 0.376 | 0.296 | 0.568 | 0.900 | 0.567 | |||||
- Citation: Meng YS, Zhang XW, Kang JL, Zhou JJ. Thoracoscopic vs open esophagectomy: Short-term efficacy with laparoscopic gastric tube. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(5): 116490
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i5/116490.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.116490