Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 115825
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.115825
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.115825
Table 1 Evidence on the neoadjuvant response in mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma
| Ref. | Design | Population | Key findings |
| Huang et al[3], 2021 | Meta-analysis (15 studies) | > 9000 patients | MAC associated with OR 0.38 for pCR and 0.31 for tumor downstaging vs non-MAC |
| Zhang et al[18], 2021 | Pooled analysis of 3 prospective trials | 743 patients (8.5% MAC) | pCR: 7.5% in MAC vs 22.0% non-MAC; yp stage 0-I: 20.8% vs 48.7%; DFS 3-year: 58.4% vs 77.6% |
| McCawley et al[23], 2016 | Meta-analysis | Multiple datasets | Higher CRM positivity (OR 5.02) and mortality (OR 1.53) in MAC |
| Yu et al[56], 2014 | MRI-based prognostic study | Retrospective cohort | Poor radiologic regression; acellular mucin mimics residual tumor on MRI |
- Citation: Patriti A, Graziano F, Chiari R. Mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma and neoadjuvant therapy: Implications for surgical practice. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(5): 115825
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i5/115825.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.115825