BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2026; 18(4): 117517
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.117517
Table 7 Comparison of secondary prognostic indicators among three groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
Indicator
Low SI group (n = 78)
Moderate SI group (n = 89)
High SI group (n = 45)
Statistic
P value
Effect size
Pairwise comparison P values2
Postoperative hemoglobin changes (g/L)
    24 hours postoperative106.8 ± 16.484.2 ± 14.768.9 ± 13.2F = 89.6< 0.001η2 = 0.461P < 0.0013, P < 0.0014, P < 0.0015
    48 hours postoperative109.2 ± 15.889.6 ± 15.174.3 ± 14.6F = 78.4< 0.001η2 = 0.428P < 0.0013, P < 0.0014, P < 0.0015
    72 hours postoperative112.4 ± 16.295.7 ± 16.881.2 ± 15.9F = 64.7< 0.001η2 = 0.382P < 0.0013, P < 0.0014, P < 0.0015
Reoperation rate2 (2.6)8 (9.0)9 (20.0)χ2 = 8.7410.013Cramer’s V = 0.203P = 0.0963, P = 0.0034, P = 0.0845
Reoperation causesFisher’s exact test0.024
    Postoperative hemorrhage1 (1.3)5 (5.6)6 (13.3)
    Abdominal infection1 (1.3)2 (2.2)2 (4.4)
    Pancreatic fistula management0 (0.0)1 (1.1)1 (2.2)
mRS score (at discharge)χ2 = 28.461< 0.001Cramer’s V = 0.259P = 0.0063, P < 0.0014, P = 0.0215
    0 points (completely asymptomatic)52 (66.7)38 (42.7)12 (26.7)
    1 point (no significant functional deficit)18 (23.1)28 (31.5)14 (31.1)
    2 points (mild functional deficit)6 (7.7)15 (16.9)11 (24.4)
    3 points (moderate functional deficit)2 (2.6)6 (6.7)5 (11.1)
    4 points (moderate to severe functional deficit)0 (0.0)2 (2.2)1 (2.2)
    5 points (severe functional deficit)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)


Write to the Help Desk