Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2026; 18(4): 116768
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116768
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116768
Table 2 Comparison of perioperative body temperature management indicators between the two groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
| Indicator | Case group (n = 9) | Control group (n = 36) | t/χ2 value | P value |
| Preoperative warming | 3 (33.33) | 22 (61.11) | 0.157 | |
| Lowest intraoperative body temperature (°C) | 35.22 ± 0.61 | 36.15 ± 0.42 | 5.409 | < 0.001 |
| Duration of hypothermia (minutes) | 82.35 ± 25.61 | 28.75 ± 9.26 | 10.385 | < 0.001 |
| Intraoperative active warming | 2 (22.22) | 27 (75.00) | 0.006 | |
| Immediate postoperative temperature (°C) | 35.54 ± 0.72 | 36.34 ± 0.52 | 3.815 | < 0.001 |
| Temperature management compliance score | 5.13 ± 1.31 | 8.47 ± 1.11 | 7.794 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Jiang HY. Impact of perioperative temperature management nursing quality on postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(4): 116768
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i4/116768.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116768