Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2026; 18(4): 116546
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116546
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116546
Table 3 Comparison of analgesia-related indicators between two groups
| Indicator | Observation group (n = 59) | Control group (n = 58) | Statistic | P value |
| Effective PCIA pump presses [times, M (Q1, Q3)] | 8.0 (6.0, 10.0) | 14.0 (11.0, 18.0) | Z = -6.825 | < 0.001 |
| Cumulative sufentanil at 72 hours postop (μg, mean ± SD) | 68.5 ± 15.3 | 89.7 ± 18.6 | t = 6.842 | < 0.001 |
| Analgesia satisfaction score (points, mean ± SD) | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 3.7 ± 0.7 | t = 5.025 | < 0.001 |
| Rescue analgesia incidence rate, n (%) | 6 (10.2) | 18 (31.0) | χ2 = 7.783 | 0.005 |
- Citation: Zhang SX, Liao XB, Lin XL, Yang J. Role of transversus abdominis plane block combined with multimodal analgesia in early recovery after radical colorectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(4): 116546
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i4/116546.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116546