Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2026; 18(4): 116399
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116399
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116399
Table 5 Comparison of communication interruption and handover efficiency during the handover of surgical instruments between two groups
| Group | Communication-related interruptions (times) | Average interruption duration (seconds) | Total number of instrument handovers (times) | Effective handover rate (%) | Average handover time (seconds) |
| Observation group (n = 60) | 0.3 ± 0.5 | 15.3 ± 5.2 | 85.6 ± 12.4 | 99.1 ± 0.9 | 1.5 ± 0.3 |
| Control group (n = 60) | 1.1 ± 0.8 | 28.7 ± 10.4 | 112.3 ± 18.9 | 95.2 ± 2.3 | 2.8 ± 0.6 |
| t value | 5.123 | 6.225 | 9.458 | 12.341 | 15.327 |
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Tan YZ, Yang M. Standardized instrument setup shortens operating time and reduces interruptions in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery: A single-centre randomized control trial. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(4): 116399
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i4/116399.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116399