Endoscopic super-minimally invasive vs laparoscopic wedge resection for muscularis-propria-originating extraluminal gastric tumors: Efficacy and selection

doi:10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116371

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 4

This Article

(37)

(39)

(0)

(804)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.

World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2026; 18(4): 116371
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116371

Table 4 Multiple linear regression analysis

Outcome	Model fit			Surgical approach (vs LMIS)				Significant covariates
Outcome	R²	F	P value		B	95%CI	P value		B	95%CI	P value
Operative time	0.22	25.39	< 0.001	EFR	-11.13	-21.46 to -0.80	0.035	Long-axis diameter of the tumor	9.45	7.52-11.38	< 0.001
Blood loss	0.17	18.41	< 0.001	STER	-12.14	-22.11 to -2.18	0.017	Tumor size	6.25	4.45-8.05	< 0.001
Blood loss	0.17	18.41	< 0.001	STER	-12.14	-22.11 to -2.18	0.017	Alcohol history	9.57	1.87-17.18	0.015
Hospital stay	0.02	2.17	0.045	STER	-1.39	-2.30 to -0.47	0.003	None other
Surgical costs	0.28	28.58	< 0.001	EFR	-6478.55	-9021.72 to -3935.39	< 0.001	Long-axis diameter of the tumor	106.52	25.92-187.12	0.010
Surgical costs	0.28	28.58	< 0.001	STER	-11616.91	-14231.82 to -9002.00	< 0.001	Age	725.34	219.70-1230.98	0.005

CI: Confidence interval; EFR: Endoscopic full-thickness resection; STER: Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection; LMIS: Laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery.

Full Size Table

Citation: Wang LH, Wu X, Sun YT, Liu PF, Wang JF, Yuan YQ, Li HK, Linghu EQ, Chen QQ. Endoscopic super-minimally invasive vs laparoscopic wedge resection for muscularis-propria-originating extraluminal gastric tumors: Efficacy and selection. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(4): 116371
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i4/116371.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116371

Wang LH, Wu X, Sun YT, Liu PF, Wang JF, Yuan YQ, Li HK, Linghu EQ, Chen QQ. Endoscopic super-minimally invasive vs laparoscopic wedge resection for muscularis-propria-originating extraluminal gastric tumors: Efficacy and selection. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(4): 116371 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.116371]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.