BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2026; 18(4): 115864
Published online Apr 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i4.115864
Table 1 Comparison of sequence parameters between 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging and 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging
Parameter
Sequence
1.5T MRI
3.0T MRI
TR (milliseconds)Sagittal T2WI40006000
Coronal T2WI40506500
Axial T2WI44006700
Axial T1WI680600
Axial T2WI FS55008500
TE (milliseconds)Sagittal T2WI120100
Coronal T2WI80102
Axial T2WI100102
Axial T1WI1620
Axial T2WI FS90110
FOV (mm)Sagittal T2WI280 × 280300 × 300
Coronal T2WI280 × 320240 × 240
Axial T2WI240 × 300240 × 240
Axial T1WI280 × 280240 × 240
Axial T2WI FS280 × 300240 × 240
Slice thickness (mm)Sagittal T2WI4.04.0
Coronal T2WI4.03.5
Axial T2WI4.03.5
Axial T1WI4.04.0
Axial T2WI FS4.03.5
Inter-slice gap (mm)Sagittal T2WI1.00.4
Coronal T2WI1.00.4
Axial T2WI1.00.4
Axial T1WI1.00.35
Axial T2WI FS1.00.35
Number of slicesAll sequences2425


Write to the Help Desk