BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2026; 18(3): 116913
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.116913
Table 5 Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment of included observational studies
Ref.
Selection (Max 4)
Comparability (Max 2)
Outcome (Max 3)
Total NOS Score (Max 9)
Quality interpretation
Comments
Jin et al[12], 20164127Moderate qualityRetrospective surgical cohort; good case selection; limited adjustment for confounders
Tsutsumi et al[13], 20173137Moderate qualityClear outcome assessment and follow-up; limited comparability between treatment approaches
Ishihara et al[14], 20213238High qualityAdequate follow-up; multivariable analysis used to assess recurrence risk
Torres et al[15], 20214127Moderate qualityMulticenter cohort; good selection; limited control for confounding
Yan et al[16], 20243126Moderate qualitySmall sample size; high-risk population; outcome reporting adequate
Hakuta et al[17], 20244239High qualityLarge cohort; clear outcome definitions; long-term follow-up and risk factor analysis


Write to the Help Desk