Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2026; 18(3): 116203
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.116203
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.116203
Table 4 A comparison of discolouration, erosion, tissue overgrowth/assessment, intervention, monitoring scores between two groups (points), mean ± SD
| Group | Pre-intervention | Post-3 days | Post-6 days | Post-9 days | Post-12 days |
| Observation (n = 56) | 8.52 ± 1.03 | 7.48 ± 0.95 | 6.67 ± 0.88 | 4.20 ± 0.74 | 2.28 ± 0.54 |
| Control (n = 64) | 8.65 ± 0.97 | 7.64 ± 0.87 | 7.04 ± 0.91 | 5.71 ± 0.85 | 4.63 ± 0.71 |
| t value | 0.616 | 0.833 | 1.961 | 8.988 | 17.673 |
| P value | 0.539 | 0.407 | 0.053 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Du TT, He JH. Efficacy of sodium zirconium phosphate alginate dressings for peristomal dermatitis after gastrointestinal surgery: A retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(3): 116203
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i3/116203.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.116203