Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2026; 18(3): 115621
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115621
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115621
Table 4 Comparison of anastomotic leakage between the 2 groups, n (%)
| Type of AL | Study (n = 100) | Control (n = 100) | χ2 | P value | OR (95%CI) |
| Overall AL | 18 (18.00) | 32 (32.00) | 5.227 | 0.022 | 0.467 (0.241-0.904) |
| Pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) | 12 (12.00) | 25 (25.00) | 5.604 | 0.018 | 0.409 (0.192-0.870) |
| Bile leak | 6 (6.00) | 9 (9.00) | 0.617 | 0.432 | 0.652 (0.223-1.907) |
| Gastroenteric AL | 3 (3.00) | 6 (6.00) | - | 0.498a | 0.500 (0.129-1.950) |
| ≥ 2 concurrent fistulas | 2 (2.00) | 5 (5.00) | - | 0.445a | 0.400 (0.079-2.014) |
- Citation: Yan B, Zhang LQ, Shen YQ. Correlation between the initiation of early enteral nutrition and anastomotic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(3): 115621
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i3/115621.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115621