Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2026; 18(3): 115394
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115394
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115394
Table 3 Comparison of depression status, mean ± SD
| Group | HAMD score | |||
| 1-day intervention | 3-day intervention | 5-day intervention | 7-day intervention | |
| Control group (n= 50) | 31.18 ± 3.12 | 28.30 ± 3.28 | 26.80 ± 3.11 | 23.80 ± 3.69 |
| Observation group (n= 50) | 29.14 ± 3.18a | 24.36 ± 4.34a | 21.02 ± 3.09a | 17.96 ± 3.88a |
| Between groups | F =178.561; P < 0.001 | |||
| Time | F =122.104; P < 0.001 | |||
| Between groups·time1 | F =6.456; P < 0.001 | |||
- Citation: Wang LP, Ye J, He XW, Shi MR, Cheng GL. Ecological momentary assessment combined with aromatherapy on postoperative depression in elderly patients with colostomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(3): 115394
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i3/115394.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.115394