Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2026; 18(3): 114647
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.114647
Published online Mar 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.114647
Table 2 Postoperative recovery outcomes in both groups, mean ± SD
| Groups | n | Time to first flatus (hour) | Time to first defecation (hour) | Time to first bed movement (hour) | Length of stay (day) |
| Observation group | 70 | 7.34 ± 1.37 | 12.59 ± 2.42 | 10.01 ± 1.27 | 7.10 ± 1.66 |
| Control group | 70 | 9.89 ± 1.37 | 17.21 ± 2.44 | 12.81 ± 1.51 | 12.98 ± 1.80 |
| t | - | 10.984 | 11.222 | 11.896 | 20.121 |
| P value | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Li W, Liu C, Zhang HY. Application of Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle based on software, hardware, environment, liveware model in preventing infection after endoscopic mucosal resection. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(3): 114647
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i3/114647.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i3.114647