Managing reflux after tubular gastric esophageal substitution

doi:10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.116235

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 2

This Article

(36)

(102)

(0)

(361)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. No commercial re-use. See Permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.

World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 116235
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.116235

Table 4 Comparison of World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief scores between groups before and after nursing care, mean ± SD

Group	n	Physical health		Psychological health		Social relationships		Environment		Total score
Group	n	Before	After	Before	After	Before	After	Before	After	Before	After
Study	50	17.45 ± 2.17	26.71 ± 3.19^a	14.78 ± 2.36	23.19 ± 3.28^a	10.78 ± 1.15	13.17 ± 1.12^a	24.14 ± 2.29	31.21 ± 3.62^a	68.15 ± 4.16	94.02 ± 4.39^a
Control	50	17.52 ± 2.14	21.45 ± 3.13^a	14.83 ± 2.28	19.23 ± 3.11^a	10.78 ± 1.15	12.03 ± 1.24^a	23.89 ± 2.29	28.36 ± 3.37^a	68.08 ± 4.29	81.07 ± 5.23^a
t		0.162	8.321	0.110	6.201	0.047	4.823	0.552	4.078	0.082	13.411
P value		0.087	0.000	0.909	0.000	0.118	0.001	0.582	0.000	0.931	0.000

^aP < 0.05 vs same group before and after nursing.

Continuous data were compared using independent samples Student's t-test. Interpretation of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief score: The domain and total scores range from zero to 100. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life. Scores are interpreted as: < 60 = poor; 60-79 = moderate; ≥ 80 = good quality of life.

Full Size Table

Citation: Yan LJ, Shen SW, Fang TT. Managing reflux after tubular gastric esophageal substitution. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 116235
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/116235.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.116235

Yan LJ, Shen SW, Fang TT. Managing reflux after tubular gastric esophageal substitution. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 116235 [PMID: 41809354 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.116235]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.