©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 116235
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.116235
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.116235
Table 3 Comparison of the nutritional indicators before and after nursing care mean, ± SD
| Group | n | Hb (g/L) | ALB (g/L) | PA (mg/L) | |||
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Study | 50 | 57.14 ± 4.37 | 76.05 ± 5.19a | 30.78 ± 3.11 | 45.12 ± 4.98a | 281.25 ± 10.36 | 332.47 ± 15.06a |
| Control | 50 | 58.02 ± 4.71 | 62.19 ± 5.07a | 30.92 ± 3.14 | 38.26 ± 3.73a | 282.09 ± 10.24 | 310.28 ± 14.77a |
| t | 0.971 | 13.512 | 0.220 | 7.801 | 0.412 | 6.099 | |
| P value | 0.335 | 0.001 | 0.825 | 0.000 | 0.683 | 0.000 | |
- Citation: Yan LJ, Shen SW, Fang TT. Managing reflux after tubular gastric esophageal substitution. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 116235
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/116235.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.116235