©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 115744
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115744
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115744
Table 8 Adjusted Cox proportional hazards model examining the effect of percutaneous cholecystostomy placement time on mortality (n = 174)
| Characteristic | HR | 95%CI | P value |
| PCT placement interval | |||
| Early | |||
| Late | 2.58 | 1.25, 5.32 | 0.01 |
| Age | 1.05 | 1.01, 1.08 | 0.01 |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index | 1.14 | 0.98, 1.32 | 0.09 |
| ICU status | |||
| ICU | |||
| Non-ICU | 0.85 | 0.39, 1.82 | 0.7 |
| Blood culture | |||
| Negative | |||
| Positive | 0.67 | 0.28, 1.60 | 0.4 |
| Bile culture | |||
| Negative | |||
| Positive | 2.07 | 0.95, 4.49 | 0.07 |
- Citation: Hassanesfahani M, Giannis D, Marfo N, Kaur M, Quang CMPT, Miele A, Louis MA, Mandava NR. Defining endpoints in percutaneous cholecystostomy: Catheter management, patient survival, and long-term outcomes from a twelve-year retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 115744
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/115744.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.115744