©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 114951
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114951
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114951
Table 4 Comparative analysis of the ten machine learning models
| Algorithms | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Precision | Specificity | F1 score |
| SVM | 0.587 | 0.476 | 0.556 | 0.680 | 0.513 |
| XGBoost | 0.696 | 0.571 | 0.706 | 0.700 | 0.632 |
| LightGBM | 0.750 | 0.738 | 0.706 | 0.745 | 0.729 |
| LR | 0.717 | 0.714 | 0.682 | 0.720 | 0.698 |
| RF | 0.707 | 0.691 | 0.674 | 0.720 | 0.682 |
| MLP | 0.663 | 0.786 | 0.600 | 0.560 | 0.680 |
| DT | 0.739 | 0.810 | 0.680 | 0.680 | 0.739 |
| GB | 0.674 | 0.476 | 0.714 | 0.715 | 0.571 |
| KNN | 0.609 | 0.452 | 0.594 | 0.740 | 0.514 |
| ET | 0.772 | 0.857 | 0.721 | 0.760 | 0.774 |
- Citation: Lü YN, Liu D, Tao S, Wu J, Yu SJ, Yuan HL. Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting postoperative survival in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 114951
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/114951.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114951