BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 114607
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114607
Table 2 Comparison of nutritional status assessment results between groups
Nutritional assessment indicator
Nutritional risk group (n = 37)
Non-nutritional risk group (n = 43)
t/Z
P value
Baseline nutritional status
NRS2002 score (points, mean ± SD)4.2 ± 1.12.1 ± 0.810.174< 0.001
CONUT score [M (P25, P75)]4 (3, 6)2 (1, 3)-4.832< 0.001
PNI (mean ± SD)42.1 ± 6.848.9 ± 5.2-4.952< 0.001
GPS score, n (%)
0 points8 (21.6)32 (74.4)22.356< 0.001
1 point18 (48.6)9 (20.9)
2 points11 (29.7)2 (4.7)
Weight loss percentage (%)8.7 ± 4.23.1 ± 2.87.089< 0.001
Post-chemotherapy nutritional status
NRS2002 score (points, mean ± SD)4.8 ± 1.32.4 ± 0.99.635< 0.001
CONUT score [M (P25, P75)]5 (4, 7)2 (1, 4)-5.247< 0.001
PNI (mean ± SD)39.8 ± 7.147.6 ± 5.8-5.401< 0.001
Weight loss percentage (%, mean ± SD)12.4 ± 5.14.8 ± 3.27.852< 0.001


Write to the Help Desk