©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 114434
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114434
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114434
Table 3 Comparison of systemic inflammatory response indicators between the two patient groups (mean ± SD, pg/mL)
| Group | Patients | IL-6 | TNF-α | ||
| Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Control | 40 | 3.21 ± 0.85 | 13.62 ± 3.51 | 4.21 ± 1.10 | 9.86 ± 2.31 |
| Observation | 40 | 3.30 ± 0.93 | 8.77 ± 2.18 | 4.12 ± 1.05 | 7.32 ± 1.67 |
| t | 0.452 | 7.424 | 0.374 | 5.636 | |
| P value | 0.653 | 0.000 | 0.709 | 0.000 | |
- Citation: An L, Chang XY. Analysis the effectiveness nursing interventions for contrast-induced adverse reactions in postoperative general surgery patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 114434
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/114434.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114434