©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 114434
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114434
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114434
Table 2 Comparison of heart rate variability time-domain parameters between the two patient groups (mean ± SD, millisecond)
| Group | Patients | SDNN | RMSSD | ||
| Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Control | 40 | 62.85 ± 12.31 | 54.20 ± 13.72 | 38.16 ± 9.62 | 31.46 ± 9.21 |
| Observation | 40 | 63.26 ± 11.54 | 68.52 ± 10.36 | 38.76 ± 9.16 | 42.65 ± 8.92 |
| t | 0.154 | 5.268 | 0.286 | 5.520 | |
| P value | 0.878 | 0.000 | 0.776 | 0.000 | |
- Citation: An L, Chang XY. Analysis the effectiveness nursing interventions for contrast-induced adverse reactions in postoperative general surgery patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 114434
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/114434.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.114434