©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113441
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113441
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113441
Table 4 Comparison of observation indicators between the two groups (%)
| Indicator | Observation group (n = 99) | Control group (n = 99) | t/χ² | P value |
| Time to bowel sound recovery (hours, mean ± SD) | 12.53 ± 1.21 | 17.16 ± 1.07 | 28.521 | 0.000 |
| First time out-of-bed activity (hours, mean ± SD) | 23.53 ± 2.34 | 29.06 ± 1.89 | 18.293 | 0.000 |
| Length of hospital stay (days, mean ± SD) | 6.63 ± 0.46 | 9.26 ± 0.37 | 44.327 | 0.000 |
| Patient satisfaction | 100.0 | 80.81 | 21.017 | 0.000 |
| Postoperative bleeding rate | 1.01 | 5.05 | 1.547 | 0.214 |
| Perforation incidence rate | 0.00 | 6.06 | 4.297 | 0.038 |
| Postoperative infection rate | 2.02 | 7.07 | 1.862 | 0.172 |
| Overall complication rate | 3.03 | 18.18 | 11.986 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Qian YP, Cai H, Tang SY, Zhou HP, Han Q, Tu HM. Perioperative multidisciplinary nursing model for endoscopic gastric submucosal dissection development and effect evaluation. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 113441
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/113441.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113441