©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113103
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113103
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113103
Table 4 Complications across study groups, n (%)
| Complications | Two-port group (n = 80) | Four-port group (n = 70) | χ2 | P value |
| Ileus | 0 (0.00) | 1 (1.43) | ||
| Anastomotic fistula | 2 (2.50) | 2 (2.86) | ||
| Surgical site infection | 1 (1.25) | 3 (4.29) | ||
| Postoperative bleeding | 0 (0.00) | 2 (2.86) | ||
| Uroschesis | 2 (2.50) | 5 (7.14) | ||
| Intraperitoneal abscess | 3 (3.75) | 4 (5.71) | ||
| Total | 8 (10.00) | 17 (24.29) | 5.486 | 0.019 |
- Citation: Xia HX, Peng S. Two-port vs four-port laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: Efficacy and outcomes. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 113103
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/113103.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113103