©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113103
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113103
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113103
Table 2 Comparative operative measures, mean ± SD
| Operative measures | Two-port group (n = 80) | Four-port group (n = 70) | t value | P value |
| Surgical duration (minutes) | 99.69 ± 13.85 | 103.07 ± 17.51 | 1.319 | 0.189 |
| Intraoperative hemorrhage volume (mL) | 28.27 ± 8.53 | 30.63 ± 10.85 | 1.489 | 0.139 |
| Cumulative incision length (cm) | 5.58 ± 0.80 | 8.96 ± 1.20 | 20.520 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Xia HX, Peng S. Two-port vs four-port laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: Efficacy and outcomes. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 113103
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/113103.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113103