©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 113021
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113021
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113021
Table 4 Performance of different models on training and test sets
| Model | Training set | Test set | ||||
| AUC (95%CI) | Sensitivity | Specificity | AUC (95%CI) | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
| FS-T2WI | 0.756 (0.693-0.819) | 0.729 | 0.714 | 0.742 (0.615-0.869) | 0.720 | 0.710 |
| DWI | 0.721 (0.655-0.787) | 0.687 | 0.698 | 0.708 (0.574-0.842) | 0.680 | 0.677 |
| T1CE | 0.789 (0.730-0.848) | 0.771 | 0.730 | 0.775 (0.654-0.896) | 0.760 | 0.742 |
| Multimodal radiomics | 0.847 (0.796-0.898) | 0.823 | 0.794 | 0.835 (0.732-0.938) | 0.840 | 0.774 |
| Clinical model | 0.798 (0.738-0.858) | 0.750 | 0.762 | 0.782 (0.660-0.904) | 0.720 | 0.774 |
| Combined model | 0.883 (0.840-0.926) | 0.844 | 0.825 | 0.867 (0.778-0.956) | 0.840 | 0.806 |
- Citation: Zhu ZH, Liang Y, Shi M. Prediction of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer based on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(2): 113021
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i2/113021.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i2.113021