BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2026; 18(11): 125637
Published online Nov 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.125637
Table 3 The authors’ proposed specification: What a consensus process would need to fix before these applications can be standardised
Consensus item
SBO
Gastric assessment
Free fluid beyond trauma
Biliary tract
Minimum image setNumber of quadrants required for a complete study is undefined; segmental obstruction means an incomplete survey can be falsely negative. Fix: Mandated quadrants and documented images per quadrantSupine and RLD antral views are used inconsistently; some thresholds are supine-derived and others RLD-derived. Fix: Both positions mandatory, each documentedNumber and identity of dependent recesses varies outside the FAST protocol; pelvic views may be omitted in non-trauma scanning. Fix: Defined recess set for the non-traumatic indicationLong-axis and short-axis gallbladder views, wall measurement site and duct view are not standardised. Fix: Mandated views including the point of wall measurement
Measurement conventionNo published convention specifies outer-to-outer vs inner-to-inner, plane, or whether maximal or averaged loop diameter is used, a difference capable of exceeding the 2.5 mm separating the 2.5 cm and 2.75 cm thresholds. Fix: Single defined conventionAntral CSA is derived by different formulae and at different antral levels. Fix: One formula, one anatomical level, one patient position per stated thresholdVolume estimation and the distinction between trace, small, moderate and large collections are undefined; agreement falls to kappa 0.48-0.65 for this distinction. Fix: Defined volume categories with anchoring imagesWall thickness is measured at unspecified sites and on discordant scales, > 3 mm in the emergency literature against ≥ 4 mm in TG18. Fix: One threshold, one measurement site, one wall (anterior)
Definition of a positive studyWhether dilatation alone suffices, or dilatation plus abnormal peristalsis, or plus interloop fluid, varies between studies. Fix: Explicit rule for the compositeA positive study means different target volumes in different sources (empty stomach, > 1.25 mL/kg, aspiration-relevant content). Fix: State the target volume with the thresholdAny anechoic fluid vs a clinically significant volume is not distinguished. Fix: Population-specific definition, since physiological pelvic fluid differs by sex and pregnancy statusNumber and combination of signs required is unstated; agreement is kappa 0.85 for gallstones but 0.37 for the composite diagnosis. Fix: Defined minimum criteria set, aligned to TG18
Reporting lexiconTerms for peristaltic patterns and the valvulae sign are used inconsistently across the literature. Fix: Controlled vocabulary with defined termsPerlas grades 0-2 are well defined but quantitative and qualitative results are reported interchangeably. Fix: Report grade and CSA separately, never as equivalentsDescriptors of volume and location vary. Fix: Standardised recess names and volume categoriesSonographic Murphy sign has no standardised elicitation, defined transducer pressure or accounting for prior analgesia. Fix: Defined elicitation protocol, or removal of the sign from criteria
Reference standardCT, surgical findings and final clinical diagnosis are used interchangeably across pooled studies. Fix: Single specified standard, or pre-specified stratification by standardAspirated volume, endoscopic volume and model-predicted volume are used as equivalents. Fix: One standard; and outcome studies linking measurement to aspiration rather than to volumeTrauma-derived standards (CT, laparotomy) are applied to non-traumatic populations. Fix: Indication-specific reference standardFinal diagnosis, pathology and TG18 give materially different specificity (17.1% vs 85%-94%). Fix: TG18 as the uniform standard, with the index test measured on the same scale
Training volume for credentialingNo application-specific minimum; the attending-resident sensitivity gap is 14.7 percentage points. Fix: Application-specific case minimum with competency assessmentNo emergency-setting training standard exists; the available reliability study used three raters and healthy volunteers. Fix: Defined supervised case volumeFAST credentialing exists but is trauma-specific and does not cover non-traumatic indications. Fix: Extension of credentialing to the non-traumatic indicationCredentialing exists in most curricula but is not tied to demonstrated agreement on wall thickness or the Murphy sign. Fix: Competency demonstrated per sign, not per application
Quality assuranceNo archived-image review requirement; loop measurement cannot be audited if images are not stored. Fix: Mandatory archiving of the measured loopNo QA mechanism described in any cited source. Fix: Archived antral images with periodic measurement auditWhere archiving exists it is trauma-oriented. Fix: QA review of non-traumatic studies, with attention to small collectionsQA review is described in stewardship literature but is not sign-specific. Fix: Periodic audit of wall measurement and of Murphy-sign documentation
Priority reliability studies requiredInter-observer agreement for loop-diameter measurement: No published kappa or ICC was identified for this measurement, on which the entire branch turnsInter-observer agreement for antral CSA in an emergency population; and any study linking measurement to aspiration rather than to volumeInter-observer agreement for detecting a small collection in a non-traumatic emergency population, none identifiedInter-observer agreement for millimetre wall-thickness measurement in an emergency setting (none identified) and a second, multicentre study of the sonographic Murphy sign


Write to the Help Desk