Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2026; 18(11): 125637
Published online Nov 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.125637
Published online Nov 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.125637
Table 3 The authors’ proposed specification: What a consensus process would need to fix before these applications can be standardised
| Consensus item | SBO | Gastric assessment | Free fluid beyond trauma | Biliary tract |
| Minimum image set | Number of quadrants required for a complete study is undefined; segmental obstruction means an incomplete survey can be falsely negative. Fix: Mandated quadrants and documented images per quadrant | Supine and RLD antral views are used inconsistently; some thresholds are supine-derived and others RLD-derived. Fix: Both positions mandatory, each documented | Number and identity of dependent recesses varies outside the FAST protocol; pelvic views may be omitted in non-trauma scanning. Fix: Defined recess set for the non-traumatic indication | Long-axis and short-axis gallbladder views, wall measurement site and duct view are not standardised. Fix: Mandated views including the point of wall measurement |
| Measurement convention | No published convention specifies outer-to-outer vs inner-to-inner, plane, or whether maximal or averaged loop diameter is used, a difference capable of exceeding the 2.5 mm separating the 2.5 cm and 2.75 cm thresholds. Fix: Single defined convention | Antral CSA is derived by different formulae and at different antral levels. Fix: One formula, one anatomical level, one patient position per stated threshold | Volume estimation and the distinction between trace, small, moderate and large collections are undefined; agreement falls to kappa 0.48-0.65 for this distinction. Fix: Defined volume categories with anchoring images | Wall thickness is measured at unspecified sites and on discordant scales, > 3 mm in the emergency literature against ≥ 4 mm in TG18. Fix: One threshold, one measurement site, one wall (anterior) |
| Definition of a positive study | Whether dilatation alone suffices, or dilatation plus abnormal peristalsis, or plus interloop fluid, varies between studies. Fix: Explicit rule for the composite | A positive study means different target volumes in different sources (empty stomach, > 1.25 mL/kg, aspiration-relevant content). Fix: State the target volume with the threshold | Any anechoic fluid vs a clinically significant volume is not distinguished. Fix: Population-specific definition, since physiological pelvic fluid differs by sex and pregnancy status | Number and combination of signs required is unstated; agreement is kappa 0.85 for gallstones but 0.37 for the composite diagnosis. Fix: Defined minimum criteria set, aligned to TG18 |
| Reporting lexicon | Terms for peristaltic patterns and the valvulae sign are used inconsistently across the literature. Fix: Controlled vocabulary with defined terms | Perlas grades 0-2 are well defined but quantitative and qualitative results are reported interchangeably. Fix: Report grade and CSA separately, never as equivalents | Descriptors of volume and location vary. Fix: Standardised recess names and volume categories | Sonographic Murphy sign has no standardised elicitation, defined transducer pressure or accounting for prior analgesia. Fix: Defined elicitation protocol, or removal of the sign from criteria |
| Reference standard | CT, surgical findings and final clinical diagnosis are used interchangeably across pooled studies. Fix: Single specified standard, or pre-specified stratification by standard | Aspirated volume, endoscopic volume and model-predicted volume are used as equivalents. Fix: One standard; and outcome studies linking measurement to aspiration rather than to volume | Trauma-derived standards (CT, laparotomy) are applied to non-traumatic populations. Fix: Indication-specific reference standard | Final diagnosis, pathology and TG18 give materially different specificity (17.1% vs 85%-94%). Fix: TG18 as the uniform standard, with the index test measured on the same scale |
| Training volume for credentialing | No application-specific minimum; the attending-resident sensitivity gap is 14.7 percentage points. Fix: Application-specific case minimum with competency assessment | No emergency-setting training standard exists; the available reliability study used three raters and healthy volunteers. Fix: Defined supervised case volume | FAST credentialing exists but is trauma-specific and does not cover non-traumatic indications. Fix: Extension of credentialing to the non-traumatic indication | Credentialing exists in most curricula but is not tied to demonstrated agreement on wall thickness or the Murphy sign. Fix: Competency demonstrated per sign, not per application |
| Quality assurance | No archived-image review requirement; loop measurement cannot be audited if images are not stored. Fix: Mandatory archiving of the measured loop | No QA mechanism described in any cited source. Fix: Archived antral images with periodic measurement audit | Where archiving exists it is trauma-oriented. Fix: QA review of non-traumatic studies, with attention to small collections | QA review is described in stewardship literature but is not sign-specific. Fix: Periodic audit of wall measurement and of Murphy-sign documentation |
| Priority reliability studies required | Inter-observer agreement for loop-diameter measurement: No published kappa or ICC was identified for this measurement, on which the entire branch turns | Inter-observer agreement for antral CSA in an emergency population; and any study linking measurement to aspiration rather than to volume | Inter-observer agreement for detecting a small collection in a non-traumatic emergency population, none identified | Inter-observer agreement for millimetre wall-thickness measurement in an emergency setting (none identified) and a second, multicentre study of the sonographic Murphy sign |
- Citation: Danış F, Kudu E. Point-of-care ultrasound in the acute abdomen and gastrointestinal emergencies: An evidence-based guide and the case for standardisation. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(11): 125637
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i11/125637.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.125637