BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2026; 18(11): 123786
Published online Nov 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.123786
Figure 1
Figure 1 Study population, predictive timeline, and zero-leakage model development workflow. The flow chart illustrates the selection process for the final analytic cohort (n = 300) from hepatolithiasis patients undergoing hepatectomy. The predictive timeline defines the eligible predictor window prior to the prediction landmark (first postoperative imaging) to prevent look-ahead bias. The methodological framework summarizes the steps for model development and internal validation. An outcome-stratified split (7:3) yielded a development cohort (n = 211; 58 events) and a held-out validation cohort (n = 89; 24 events). Candidate predictors were evaluated across 12 candidate modeling pipelines using repeated nested cross-validation (5-fold × 3 repeats) within the development cohort. The locked least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-logistic regression model was refit on the full development cohort and subsequently evaluated once in the strictly isolated validation cohort. AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CV: Cross-validation; DCA: Decision curve analysis; LASSO-LR: Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-logistic regression.


Write to the Help Desk