BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 124479
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.124479
Table 1 Computed tomography-based body composition parameters
Parameter
Clinical meaning
Assessment method
Common diagnostic cut-off
Prognostic role
Strengths
Limitations
SMIMuscle quantity, normalized for body sizeCross-sectional skeletal muscle area at L3 (cm2), indexed to height2 (cm2/m2)Sarcopenia: < 52.4 cm2/m2 (men), < 38.5 cm2/m2 (women); BMI-adjusted cut-offs also usedOverall survival; predicts chemotherapy toxicity, postoperative complicationsWell-validated; single L3 slice correlates strongly with whole-body muscle mass; widely used across cancer/surgical literatureNo universal cut-off (varies by ethnicity, population, scanner protocol); requires dedicated software/manual segmentation; height2 normalization may under/overcorrect in obese or very short/tall patients
PMISurrogate for muscle mass using a single muscleCross-sectional area of bilateral psoas muscles at L3 or L4, indexed to height2 (cm2/m2)No consensus; commonly cited thresholds approximately < 5.0 cm2/m2 (men), < 3.4 cm2/m2 (women), varies widely by studyPostoperative complications, morbidityFast to measure (small, discrete structure); minimal manual tracing needed; feasible even on lower-quality/Limited-slice scansPoorly correlates with total skeletal muscle mass; high inter-study variability in cut-offs; psoas size affected by positioning and vertebral level chosen; less validated than SMI
SMDMuscle quality (myosteatosis/fatty infiltration)Mean CT attenuation (HU) of skeletal muscle at L3Myosteatosis: < 41 HU (BMI < 25) or < 33 HU (BMI ≥ 25)Overall survival, independent of muscle quantityCaptures muscle quality, not just size - adds prognostic information beyond SMI; low cost (same CT slice as SMI)Attenuation affected by CT protocol/reconstruction settings and contrast phase; BMI-stratified cut-offs complicate use; less intuitive for clinicians
VFAAdiposity, visceral fat burdenCross-sectional visceral adipose tissue area at L3 (or umbilicus level), cm2Visceral obesity: ≥ 100 cm2 (women), ≥ 130-163 cm2 (men), varies by study/ethnicityPostoperative and infectious complicationsStrong correlate of metabolic risk and surgical complication risk; reproducible measurementCut-offs not standardized across populations; requires accurate delineation from subcutaneous fat; single-slice VFA may not reflect total visceral fat volume
IMACPoor muscle quality (fat infiltration within/around muscle)Ratio of CT attenuation of intramuscular/paraspinal fat to that of paraspinal muscle (using psoas or paraspinal muscles)No universal threshold; typically defined by cohort-specific median or tertile splitMortalityComplements SMD; useful when psoas is the only reliably visualized muscle group; correlates with frailtyLacks standardized cut-off; formula/muscle group varies between studies, limiting comparability; less widely validated than SMI/SMD


Write to the Help Desk