Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 123208
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.123208
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.123208
Table 3 Common mimics that should not be prematurely labeled as hepatic hemangioma
| Mimic | Typical ultrasound/CEUS pattern | Typical CT/MRI pattern | Clue arguing against classic HH |
| Focal nodular hyperplasia | May be iso- or mildly hyperechoic; spoke-wheel vascularity can be present | Homogeneous arterial enhancement; often iso/hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase | Presence of functioning hepatocytes and hepatobiliary phase uptake argues against HH |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | Variable; often not classically hyperechoic in cirrhosis | Arterial phase hyperenhancement with washout/capsule; diffusion restriction more common | Cirrhotic background, washout, growth, and capsule should override a hemangioma default assumption |
| Hypervascular metastasis | Often multiple; CEUS may show rim or targetoid enhancement | Ring-like or targetoid arterial enhancement, lower T2 signal, restricted diffusion, no progressive blood-pool matching | Known malignancy, multiplicity, interval growth, and ring enhancement make HH less likely |
- Citation: Ma YX, Zhou CM, Yilihaer Y, Jiang TM, Ruze R, Shao YM, Wen H, Aji T. Diagnosis and surgical decision-making in hepatic hemangioma: From venous malformation overlap to artificial intelligence-assisted multimodality imaging. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 123208
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i10/123208.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.123208