Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 123122
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.123122
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.123122
Table 4 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation certainty of evidence
| Outcome | Studies/participants | Design | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias | Certainty |
| Intestinal obstruction | 9/2328 | Observational cohorts | Residual confounding | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | Undetected; limited power | Low |
| Internal hernia | 5/618 | Observational cohorts | Residual confounding | Not serious | Not serious | Serious (sparse events) | Undetected; limited power | Very low |
| Anastomotic leak | 7/2594 | Observational cohorts | Residual confounding | Not serious | Serious (procedure-specific) | Serious | Undetected; limited power | Very low |
| Unplanned reoperation | 6/2360 | Observational cohorts | Residual confounding | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | Undetected; limited power | Low |
| Hospital stay | 3/928 | Observational cohorts | Residual confounding | Serious (I2 = 87%) | Serious (care pathways) | Serious/unstable | Undetected; limited power | Very low |
- Citation: Zhang X, Chen XR, Zhu YJ. Efficacy of pelvic floor peritoneal reconstruction after laparoscopic resection of middle and low rectal cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 123122
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i10/123122.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.123122