Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 122160
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.122160
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.122160
Table 2 Comparison of molecular biomarker detection results between the two groups, n (%) or mean ± SD
| Baseline characteristics | Recurrence group (n = 38) | Non-recurrence group (n = 98) | χ2/t | P value |
| CEA (ng/mL) | 39.65 ± 4.17 | 38.79 ± 4.52 | 1.017 | 0.311 |
| AFP (ng/mL) | 23.17 ± 3.92 | 22.83 ± 4.05 | 0.443 | 0.658 |
| PD-L1 positivity | 13.322 | < 0.001 | ||
| Positive | 29 (76.32) | 36 (40.91) | ||
| Negative | 9 (23.68) | 52 (59.09) | ||
| CA125 (U/mL) | 30.17 ± 2.94 | 29.56 ± 3.18 | 1.025 | 0.307 |
| TMB (mut/Mb) | 14.51 ± 2.82 | 10.13 ± 1.56 | 16.782 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Yang Y, Liu HD, Yang XY, Li X, Cui LJ. Recurrence risk prediction of small-molecule drugs plus chemo in postoperative gastric cancer: Retrospective analysis via molecular markers. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 122160
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i10/122160.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.122160