BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 121503
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.121503
Table 2 Comparison of multi-slice spiral computed tomography features between the two groups
MSCT feature
Very high-risk group (n = 35)
Non-very high-risk group (n = 123)
Statistic
P value
Growth patternχ2 = 15.237< 0.001
    Intraluminal/extraluminal15 (42.9)95 (77.2)
    Mixed intra- and extraluminal20 (57.1)28 (22.8)
Irregular or lobulated morphology28 (80.0)39 (31.7)χ2 = 26.811< 0.001
Ill-defined margin25 (71.4)34 (27.6)χ2 = 23.456< 0.001
Heterogeneous enhancement32 (91.4)59 (48.0)χ2 = 21.543< 0.001
Marked enhancement25 (71.4)60 (48.8)χ2 = 5.8320.016
Signs of adjacent organ invasion16 (45.7)9 (7.3)χ2 = 32.115< 0.001
Distant metastasis10 (28.6)1 (0.8)Fisher’s exact test< 0.001
Maximum tumor diameter (cm)12.1 (9.5-15.8)4.5 (2.8-7.1)Z = -8.245< 0.001
NAR (%)28.5 (18.4-42.1)5.2 (1.5-12.8)Z = -9.012< 0.001


Write to the Help Desk