BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2026; 18(10): 120555
Published online Oct 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.120555
Table 1 Key clinical trials and studies evaluating circulating biomarkers in colorectal cancer
Biomarker
Study/trial
Population
Key findings
Level of evidence
Ref.
ctDNA (MRD detection)DYNAMIC-IIIStage III colon cancer (n = 1002)ctDNA-guided de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin exposure (88.6% → 34.8%) without compromising 3-year RFS in low-risk patients; non-inferiority not formally metPhase II/III randomized[45,46]
TRACC Part BStage I-III CRC (n = 214 evaluable)Tissue-free MRD detection; 2-year RFS 91.1% (ctDNA-) vs 50.4% (ctDNA+); HR 6.5; lead time 73 monthsProspective cohort[44]
Faulkner meta-analysis37 studies (n = 3002)Postoperative ctDNA positivity strongly associated with poorer PFS (HR 6.92; 95%CI 4.49-10.64)Meta-analysis[42]
Barault et al[47]mCRC (n = 182)Five-gene methylation panel (EYA4, GRIA4, ITGA4, MAP3K14-AS1, MSC) detected in 85.7%; dynamics correlated with response and PFSProspective cohort[47]
Methylation markersWang et al[48] MethylDTMulticenter (n = 1194)NTMT1/MAP3K14-AS1 methylation: Sensitivity 91.2% for CRC, 87.4% for stage I-II; specificity 92.4%Multicenter validation[48]
Protein markersDuan et al[49]Discovery (n = 72) + validation (n = 191)SETD7 identified by proteomics; sensitivity 92.2%, specificity 81.1%, AUC 0.947; correlated with stage and MSICase-control + functional[49]
IL-8 (prognostic)Meta-analysisMultiple studiesHigh IL-8 levels significantly correlated with shorter OS and PFS; effect stronger for circulating than tissue IL-8Meta-analysis[15]
Meta-analysisMultiple studiesPooled diagnostic accuracy: AUC 0.92, sensitivity 70%, specificity 91%Meta-analysis[20]
Björkman et al[31]328 CRC patientsIL-8 was the only significant univariate prognostic factor after FDR correction (HR = 4.88); machine learning identified IL-8 and IL-2Ra for multivariate modelProspective cohort[31]
Park et al[55]400 CRC patientsIL-8 and LMR were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS; composite classification enhanced prognostic valueProspective cohort[55]
IL-8 (Predictive)Suenaga et al[58]mCRC on bevacizumab/regorafenib (n = 125)High IL-8 associated with liver metastasis and shorter OS (HR = 4.31)Pooled analysis[58]
Sanmamed et al[59]Melanoma/NSCLC on anti-PD-1Changes in serum IL-8 reflected and predicted response to immunotherapyProspective cohort[59]
IL-8 (Genetic)Lurje et al[57]Stage III colon cancer (n = 125)IL-8 T-251A polymorphism predicted tumor recurrence; combined with VEGF C+936T identified highest risk groupRetrospective cohort[57]
CEABeom et al[27]Discovery (n = 2021) + validation (n = 171)High-normal CEA (2.1-5.0 ng/mL) independently prognostic; optimal cutoff 2.1 ng/mL; influenced by smoking and tumor locationRetrospective + prospective validation[27]
MMRATOMICStage III dMMR colon cancer (n = 700)mFOLFOX + atezolizumab improved DFS vs mFOLFOX alonePhase III RCT[26]
NICHE-2Locally advanced dMMR colon cancer (n = 112)Neoadjuvant nivolumab + ipilimumab → pCR > 65%, excellent 3-year DFSPhase II[25]
KRAS + lateralityKamphues et al[28]International retrospective, n = 1093 resected non-metastatic CRCKRAS mutation prognostic only in left-sided tumors; not in right-sided or rectalRetrospective cohort[28]
Tran et al[32]NCDB analysis, n = 5292 stage I-III colon cancerInteraction between KRAS and laterality: In mutant KRAS, left-sided worse OS; in wild-type, left-sided better OSRetrospective cohort[32]
HER2HERACLESKRAS wild-type, HER2-positive mCRC (n = 27)Trastuzumab + lapatinib active in HER2-positive mCRCPhase II[33]
NTRKDrilon et al[37]NTRK fusion-positive cancers (n = 55, including CRC)Larotrectinib demonstrated high response rates across tumor typesPhase I/II[37]


Write to the Help Desk