Comparing efficacy of a jejunostomy tube vs a nasojejunal nutrient tube after pancreatectomy

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 1

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 113967
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.113967

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of the relationship between two groups of patients and hypostatic pneumonia

Group	β	SD	Wald	OR	Binary logistic regression, objective risk (95%CI)	P value
JT	-	-	-	1	1	-
NJT	1.534	0.702	4.771	4.636	(1.171, 18.363)	0.029

JT: Jejunostomy tube; NJT: Nasojejunal tube.

Citation: Guo Y, Zhang M, Liu N, Meng XK, Li J. Comparing efficacy of a jejunostomy tube vs a nasojejunal nutrient tube after pancreatectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(1): 113967
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i1/113967.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.113967

Guo Y, Zhang M, Liu N, Meng XK, Li J. Comparing efficacy of a jejunostomy tube vs a nasojejunal nutrient tube after pancreatectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(1): 113967 [PMID: 41695860 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.113967]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.