©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 113894
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.113894
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.113894
Table 3 Assessment of effusion volume, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Time point | Effusion volume (mL) | Mild effusion | Moderate effusion | Massive effusion | F/χ2 | P value |
| POD1 | 38.25 ± 15.62 | 25 (31.25) | 3 (3.75) | 0 (0.00) | 35.462 | < 0.001 |
| POD3 | 89.74 ± 42.11 | 22 (27.50) | 31 (38.75) | 5 (6.25) | ||
| POD7 | 63.38 ± 28.94 | 33 (41.25) | 10 (12.50) | 4 (5.00) | ||
| Level distribution | - | 29.751 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Gao XX, Su SH, Huang DD. Dynamic ultrasound monitoring of intraperitoneal effusion for predicting complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(1): 113894
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i1/113894.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.113894