©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 112927
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.112927
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.112927
Table 2 Intraoperative situation, n (%)
| Cannula group (n = 37) | Control group (n = 33) | Value of statistics | P value | |
| Operative method | χ² = 1.204 | 0.548 | ||
| Intestinal adhesiolysis | 9 (24.3) | 12 (36.4) | ||
| Intestinal resection | 16 (43.2) | 12 (36.4) | ||
| Intestinal anastomosis | 12 (32.4) | 9 (27.3) | ||
| Intestinal decompression time (minutes) [mean (IQR)] | 10 (9, 10) | 16 (15, 17) | Z = 7.108 | < 0.001 |
| Reduced pressure amount (mL) [mean (IQR)] | 700 (680, 750) | 580 (550, 600) | Z = 7.197 | < 0.001 |
| Surgical field contamination | χ² = 4.953 | 0.026 | ||
| No | 32 (86.5) | 21 (63.6) | ||
| Yes | 5 (13.5) | 12 (36.4) | ||
| Operative time (minutes) [mean (IQR)] | 150 (140, 160) | 180 (170, 200) | Z = 6.183 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Zhang Q, He XH, Liu X, Ling XJ, Zhang YM. Application of a novel small intestine decompression method in patients with intestinal obstruction: A retrospective cohort study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(1): 112927
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i1/112927.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.112927