Evaluation of efficacy and safety of different endoscopic polypectomy techniques for colonic polyps

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 9

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Cohort Study

World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 110347
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.110347

Table 4 Surgical details, mean ± SD/n (%)

Parameters	HFE (n = 107)	CSP (n = 106)	EMR (n = 108)	P¹ value	P² value	P³ value
Total procedure time (minutes)	29.38 ± 2.11	32.58 ± 2.24^c	31.34 ± 2.35^c^,^e	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
Prophylactic clip use	10 (9.35)	1 (0.94)^b	3 (2.77)	0.018	0.627	0.129
Operator experience				0.207	0.530	0.654
Experienced endoscopist	106 (99.07)	99 (93.4)	103 (95.37)
Non-experienced endoscopist	1 (0.93)	7 (6.6)	5 (4.63)
Intraoperative bleeding (mL)	4.18 ± 0.25	4.16 ± 0.29	4.22 ± 0.13	1.806	0.162	0.264
Hospital time (days)	0.96 ± 0.58	0.82 ± 0.44	0.97 ± 0.56	0.114	0.090	2.703

¹High-frequency electroresection vs cold snare polypectomy.

²Cold snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection.

³High-frequency electroresection vs endoscopic mucosal resection.

^bP < 0.01 vs high-frequency electroresection group.

^cP < 0.001 vs high-frequency electroresection group.

^eP < 0.001 vs cold snare polypectomy group.

HFE: High-frequency electroresection; CSP: Cold snare polypectomy; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection.

Citation: Ji DH, Guan ZA. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of different endoscopic polypectomy techniques for colonic polyps. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(9): 110347
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i9/110347.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.110347

Ji DH, Guan ZA. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of different endoscopic polypectomy techniques for colonic polyps. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(9): 110347 [PMID: 41024807 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.110347]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.